Padleigh Hill
293.8 m · net rise 37.0 m · total ascent 37.9 m · overall 12.6% · confidence: good · Englishcombe · Somerset · share
Shape: sustained — 36% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 157 m.
Not yet matched against documented climbs — the measurement stands on its own.
≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 12% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.
Gradient ladder what do windows mean?
| Window | Maximum | Located at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 m (diagnostic) | ≈33% | 22–24 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 41.3% at 29–31 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 3 m (diagnostic) | ≈28% | 21–24 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 38.1% at 29–32 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 5 m | ≈27% | 22–27 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 33.1% at 28–33 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 10 m | ≈24% | 19–29 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 31.4% at 28–38 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 20 m | ≈21.7% | 9–29 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 28.4% at 25–45 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 25 m | ≈21.3% | 4–29 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 27.4% at 20–45 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 50 m | ≈12.6% | 108–158 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 23.3% at 1–51 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
| 100 m | ≈12.4% | 81–181 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 15.7% at 0–100 m across ground that holds no carriageway surface at the route line (sunken, walled or sharply embanked) — excluded |
may start earliermay continue beyond end Extent detection suggests reviewing where this climb starts/ends.
Map
Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap
This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.
Measured, not vetted. This page records what the laser record shows about the road's shape — nothing more. Nobody has necessarily ridden or inspected this road for the survey, and a page here is not a recommendation and no guarantee that the road is open, surfaced, rideable or safe. Gates, private sections, missing rights of way and hazards do not show up in elevation data. Check access and conditions on the ground and make your own judgment.
Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed · Share this climb
© OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap
Profile
The profile and gradient chart share one position — move your pointer over them and the marker follows. Colors are the gradient bands; the shaded span is the steepest 25 m.
Measurement card
| Elevation | Environment Agency — EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022) |
|---|---|
| Resolution / CRS | 1.0 m grid, EPSG:27700; sampled every 1.0 m, bilinear interpolation |
| Tiles | ST7060.tif |
| Road centreline | OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract), snapshot 2026-08-12T20:21:46Z |
| Quality status | measurement confidence B; caveated windows: placement excluded |
| Analysis | OCL 0.1.0, analysis 0.1.0, run chunk-03-260901, calculated 2026-09-01 |
Provenance
{
"analysis_version": "0.1.0",
"sample_interval_m": 1.0,
"interpolation": "bilinear",
"smoothing": "none",
"gradient_windows_m": [
5.0,
10.0,
20.0,
25.0,
50.0,
100.0
],
"diagnostic_windows_m": [
2.0,
3.0
],
"elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
"elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
"elevation_tiles": [
"data/cache/england/bulk_dtm_1m/ST7060.tif"
],
"calculated_at": "2026-09-01T04:01:03+00:00",
"road_source": "OpenStreetMap (local PBF extract)",
"road_attribution": "\u00a9 OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL",
"osm_pbf_path": "data/cache/pbf/england-2026-08-12-roads.osm.pbf",
"osm_snapshot": "2026-08-12T20:21:46Z",
"run_id": "chunk-03-260901",
"elevation_provider": "Environment Agency",
"elevation_dataset": "EA LIDAR Composite DTM 1m (2022)",
"elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Environment Agency",
"elevation_coverage_id": "13787b9a-26a4-4775-8523-806d13af58fc__Lidar_Composite_Elevation_DTM_1m",
"elevation_tile_ids": [
"ST7060.tif"
],
"trimmed_from": "padleigh-hill",
"trim_cut_m": [
[
0.0,
90.1
]
],
"license": "ODbL-1.0",
"license_url": "https://howsteep.org/licensing.html"
}