Parc-Seymour to Castell-prin
478.0 m · net rise 48.2 m · overall 10.1% · confidence: good
Shape: stepped — 45% of the climbing sits in a quarter of the distance; longest continuous stretch at 10%+ is 95 m.
Found purely from mapping and LiDAR data, and not yet matched against books, race records or lists — it may be well known to locals under a name we've never heard. It was cross-checked against the OS road network, surface models and map tags, but a discovery can still be an artifact of the terrain model or the map. Treat it as a well-evidenced hypothesis until someone has ridden it. If you know this road, tell us what you found — photographs, corrections and local knowledge all welcome; the map links below let you scout it first.
≈ Overhead cover (tree canopy or structures) spans 47% of this route — detected by comparing the surface model (DSM, treetops and rooftops) against the terrain model (DTM, bare ground). Under cover the bare-ground model is built from fewer laser returns, so metre-scale readings can wobble; maxima whose window sits in a covered zone are marked ≈ below — less certain — the flag does not say whether the true value is higher or lower. Longer windows average over more clean ground and are steadier.
Gradient ladder what do windows mean?
| Window | Maximum | Located at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 m (diagnostic) | ≈45% | 406–408 m | under overhead cover |
| 3 m (diagnostic) | ≈42% | 407–410 m | under overhead cover |
| 5 m | ≈37% | 406–411 m | under overhead cover |
| 10 m | ≈35% | 401–411 m | under overhead cover |
| 20 m | ≈31.5% | 398–418 m | under overhead cover |
| 25 m | ≈29.5% | 393–418 m | under overhead cover |
| 50 m | ≈23.3% | 381–431 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 25.0% at 370–420 m across terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded |
| 100 m | ≈10.0% | 191–291 m | under overhead cover terrain reads 19.8% at 345–445 m across terrain that holds no road surface (dense canopy, no bench) — excluded |
Map
Check this route yourself: Google Maps route via their router · Street View at the base where coverage exists · geojson.io our exact measured line · OpenTopoMap
This climb's data: OCL JSON — the full gradient ladder, quality flags and provenance in the OpenClimb Ladder format.
Ridden it, or know better? Submit data for this climb no account needed
© OpenStreetMap contributors · topo tiles © OpenTopoMap (CC-BY-SA) · vector tiles OpenFreeMap
Profile
Provenance
{
"analysis_version": "0.1.0",
"sample_interval_m": 1.0,
"interpolation": "bilinear",
"smoothing": "none",
"gradient_windows_m": [
5.0,
10.0,
20.0,
25.0,
50.0,
100.0
],
"diagnostic_windows_m": [
2.0,
3.0
],
"elevation_crs": "EPSG:27700",
"elevation_resolution_m": 1.0,
"elevation_tiles": [
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_5_340191_20201201dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_5_340192_20201224dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_5_341191_20201201dtm.tif",
"data/cache/wales/dtm_1m/wg_del_5_341192_20201224dtm.tif"
],
"calculated_at": "2026-08-13T02:09:43+00:00",
"road_source": "wales-discovered-adopted-routes/discovered-lane-51-6238-2-8523.geojson",
"elevation_provider": "Welsh Government",
"elevation_dataset": "Welsh Government LiDAR 1m DTM (2020-2023)",
"elevation_licence": "Open Government Licence v3 \u2014 \u00a9 Crown copyright Welsh Government",
"elevation_catalogue_layer": "geonode:welsh_government_lidar_tile_catalogue_2020_2023",
"elevation_tile_ids": [
"wg_del_5_340191_20201201dtm.tif",
"wg_del_5_340192_20201224dtm.tif",
"wg_del_5_341191_20201201dtm.tif",
"wg_del_5_341192_20201224dtm.tif"
],
"elevation_capture_dates": [
"01-12-2020",
"24-12-2020"
],
"route_summit_trim_m": 496.3,
"route_summit_trim_loss_m": 24.3,
"climb_origin": "discovered",
"notes": "Coarse pass: max 13.9% over 200 m (Terrain 50), gain 21.2 m over 919 m way. EXTENDED by graph walk: +1 segment(s) at base, +0 at top (stop: base=no_descending_continuation, top=no_ascending_continuation; min_avg=2.0%). Review before adopting. ADOPTED (notable slice 2026-08-11): qualified-steep. AUTO-NAMED from gazetteer (hypothesis, unreviewed): was 'Discovered lane (51.6238, -2.8523)'."
}